The Set: Bayern Munich 1–2 Cologne

by Double Pivot on February 23, 2009 · 1 comment

Daum

I doubt many peo­ple expected Cologne’s visit to Allianz to pro­duce one of the best games of the week­end, but Christophe Daum and his scrappy side went to Munich (with only one win in their last 15 vis­its) and shocked the Bavar­i­ans. Two beau­ti­fully crafted coun­ters along with 45 min­utes of orga­nized defend­ing was the for­mula for the Billy Goats. But one can­not look past the egre­gious call made 13 min­utes into the game that would have changed the look of this game significantly.

How­ever, the poor deci­sion by the lines­man should not clear Bay­ern of a woe­ful dis­play in front of their faith­ful, and it should def­i­nitely not take away from an inspir­ing per­for­mance by Cologne. The win breaks a streak of four straight draws and sets the pro­moted side 10 points clear of the drop zone, which should clear them of any fur­ther wor­ries. Mean­while, the favorites lost their fifth game of the sea­son (3 more than the whole of last year) and they now have allowed as many goals as bottom-dwelling Glad­bach at home. Defense is a big issue, and it would seem that they might pos­si­bly be the least likely of the “group of six” to end up with the title come season’s end.

Seven Ran­dom Facts about Bay­ern and Cologne

1. Off­sides

So Babak Rafati inter­prets the rule for off­side dif­fer­ently? In his world, any pass, whether its from your own player, or glanced off say the head of a defender like Kevin McKenna, counts toward the attack­ing player’s posi­tion. Had Klose’s goal been allowed to stand, right­fully, how dif­fer­ent the game might have been. Cologne were play­ing a sim­ple counter attack, which could be expected of any under­dog away side. But had they been forced to chase the game, espe­cially so early on, this tac­tic would have had to been aban­doned and Bay­ern would have had more orga­ni­za­tion. Thus Cologne would not have been able to exploit the bevy of holes in the Klinsmann’s defense.

Regard­less, the most impres­sive part of this goal was that, despite the deflec­tion by McKenna, Klose kept his con­cen­tra­tion, adjusted his angle on the ball and fin­ished the goal. It’s too bad it didn’t stand on it’s merit alone.

2. The Mod­ern “M”

We call it at 4–3-3. It is closer to a 4–5-1. But the truth is that Daum has set out a mod­ern M (with­out the W) in his mid­field. It looks like this:

Cologne's Modern M

In our haste to define sys­tems in a slightly rigid way, it is inter­est­ing to note that Daum is doing some­thing com­pletely dif­fer­ent. And it is work­ing. It is easy to look at Petit and say he’s a DM, but he’s not play­ing that Makalele type role that we have come accus­tomed to defin­ing the posi­tion by. He plays higher up, break­ing up play before it can get to the deeper lying Brosin­ski and Pez­zoni. And play does flow through him, unlike a typ­i­cal holder. And with him obvi­ously capa­ble of track­ing back, the deeper mid­field­ers do have license to get for­ward. Brosin­ski was able to get for­ward and was piv­otal to both goals. I’ve seen Pez­zoni do the same, although today he was more com­mit­ted to defense.

3. Brosin­ski and Brecko on the right

First, you do not need to check their pock­ets for Franck Ribery. Few could com­pletely nul­lify the diminu­tive French­man. But the two of them had an objec­tive, which was to crowd Ribery’s space, and they did a spec­tac­u­lar job of it. Ribery was still a dan­ger, but Brecko shad­owed him the entire game on the wing and Brosin­ski cov­ered the chan­nel. Ribery was not the fac­tor we have come to expect as he wasn’t able to run at the defense and he was often forced into hur­ry­ing his passes. These two showed that tenac­ity is enough to limit Ribery’s impact and give any team a chance.

4. The Sweet Counter

A nice counter attack is a beau­ti­ful thing. Cologne’s first goal came of a fan­tas­tic one, led by their new sign­ing and Ribery agi­ta­tor, Daniel Brosin­ski. Podol­ski was stripped of the ball by Brosin­ski who then threads a pass to Vuci­ce­vic through three Bay­ern play­ers. Vuci­ce­vic plays two give-and-go’s with Petit in his own half and Novakovic in Bayern’s half that cov­ers and third of the pitch and sets him free in front of Bayern’s defense. Ehret mean­while ghosts in from the left. Oddo fails to fol­low and Dimiche­lis, who had a poor match, does noth­ing to stop the Frenchman’s run. Vuci­ce­vic threads a nifty pass into space and the angling Ehret gets to ball and slots it in to the far post for the first goal.

Cologne\‘s First Goal

5. Speak­ing of Ehret

Per­haps Klins­mann was try­ing to get the best out of Podol­ski by play­ing him against his former/future club. Rather than inspir­ing the Clown­prinz, what he did was inspire Fab­rice Ehret, who had a blind­ing game. He looks to occupy Podolski’s posi­tion in Daum’s mod­ern “M” and I don’t see Podol­ski being able to win the posi­tion as he doesn’t have Ehret’s tac­ti­cal acu­men. Ehret is a bet­ter player, at the moment, and Podol­ski could face an uphill bat­tle to unseat him. It seem he’s bound for a sim­i­lar sit­u­a­tion in Cologne to the one he faces in Munich. As the say­ing goes, “never go back”.

6. Like for Like

Klins­mann tactic’s are going to be heav­ily ana­lyzed as Bay­ern go into full scale cri­sis mode. How­ever, it’s jus­ti­fied to blame them. While he set out a sys­tem that should have worked, it wasn’t. And rather than chang­ing it, he only swapped pieces. Ribery was never moved to the cen­ter where he might have ben­e­fited from the change. He stuck to two strik­ers, when one or three might have caused McKenna and Geromel to change their sta­tions. And he stuck with a back four when it was obvi­ous that Cologne had set up shot to pro­tect the lead.

His sub­sti­tu­tions were all like for like with Dono­van com­ing in for Podol­ski, Alt­in­top for Schwe­in­steiger and Borowski for Ze Roberto. All three sub­sti­tu­tions were like for like, rather an attempt to change the dynam­ics. It was either arro­gance or stu­pid­ity and it did cost them the game. Not as much as the non-goal, but still.

7. Lucky

Due to the fan­tas­tic effort by the whole of the Cologne side, I find it rather hard to say that they were very lucky to win this game. While the goal-that-wasn’t isn’t their fault and they took advan­tage of the gift, I don’t think Daum was smart to set 10 behind the ball for 45 min­utes. He got away with it, but when you defend a lead (with no care to increase your lead) for an entire half against a decent side, let alone Bay­ern Munich, you have to con­sider your­self lucky to get the full 3 points. While Bay­ern did pull one back late, they had a dozen build ups that should have resulted in the lev­eler and win­ner. Geromel and Mon­dragon were on top form, but they rode their luck to the victory.

GD Star Rat­ing
load­ing…
The Set: Bay­ern Munich 1–2 Cologne, 5.0 out of 5 based on 1 rating

1 comment… read it below or add one

1 Juliet February 26, 2009 at 1:36 pm

I sometimes wonder about Klinsi’s willingness to try new tactics after his initial failure with the 3-5-2 experiment.

There is no reason the BM back line should be so fragile — with the exception of Oddo, who is surely better than Jansen, it’s exactly the same as last year. But here they are, making all kinds of insane mistakes. And Rensing so far hasn’t shown himself capable of handling the pressure when the back line screws up. BM may be on the transfer market again this summer, because I’m concerned about Rensing facing the next round of CL competition.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: