In Retrospect, Bayern’s Performance Wasn’t as Embarassing as Chelsea’s

by Double Pivot on April 30, 2009 · 10 comments

Yes, the first half of Bayern’s match against Barcelona at the Camp Nou was embar­rass­ing for the Bavar­i­ans. Sure it could have been worse had Barca not taken their foot off the gas in the sec­ond half of that game. And no, we can’t know what the out­come would have been back at the Allianz with­out the the K2 like obsta­cle. How­ever, all is not lost.

No, I am not at a Bay­ern sup­porter, but nei­ther am a hater. I am quite ambiva­lent about them though. And while fun­ner to watch, they rate on the Bochum level to me. So with that out of the way, when it comes to Europe, I am obvi­ously a Bay­ern fan. And I was embar­rassed after the first leg tie with Barcelona. It was a spec­ta­cle to behold, the way the Cules cut through Germany’s largest club; unfor­tu­nately, the spec­ta­cle was embar­rass­ing for a Bun­desliga supporter.

Then I watched last night when Chelsea vis­ited Camp Nou and played a brand of foot­ball that Rangers would brand as dull and life­less. I then revis­ited last year’s trip to Cat­alo­nia that even­tual champion’s Man­ches­ter United made to the cathe­dral of attack­ing foot­ball. It was pos­si­bly more insipid than Chelsea’s per­for­mance, but a year has made us for­get. And after watch­ing the pathetic, inept and incred­u­lous dis­plays of foot­ball by two of the big four team’s of football’s home­land, I am proud that Bay­ern tried to play. Sure nil-nil looks bet­ter, but when it comes to foot­ball, I will always take style over sub­stance. Bet­ter to lose by try­ing to play your game, even with a loss by a sig­nif­i­cant amount, than ever win with anti-football: what is fast becom­ing British-football. They may have money and suc­cess right now, but with teams that suc­ceed uti­liz­ing foot­ball that would make 1989 Wim­bel­don seem like November’s Hof­fen­heim, Eng­land is bound for a huge fall.

The are sus­tained by tele­vi­sion rev­enue, and that will dry up when peo­ple begin to real­ize that our league and La Liga are much fun­ner to watch. So, while I empathize with Bay­ern fans over the loss and it’s sever­ity and I bemoan the lost coef­fi­cient points, I would still rather be a team/fan that lost with vision than one that won with flac­cid­ity. And let’s hope that Barca score at Stam­ford Bridge.

GD Star Rat­ing
load­ing…
In Ret­ro­spect, Bayern’s Per­for­mance Wasn’t as Embarass­ing as Chelsea’s, 5.0 out of 5 based on 1 rating

10 comments… read them below or add one

1 allan April 30, 2009 at 1:34 am

YEA, SO MUCH FOR YOUR PREFERRED STYLE THAT YOUR GOT MAULED SO BADLY THAT YOU’D WISH YOU HAD PLAYED LIKE MANU U OR CHELSEA.

IN ANY MATCH, IT’S ALL ABOUT STRATEGY. IN A BOXING MATCH AND YOU’RE FIGHTING A CHAP A FOOT TALLER THAN YOU, WOULD YOU FIGHT HIM FROM A DISTANCE?

Reply

2 Socrates April 30, 2009 at 1:43 am

“Anti-football”?
True, if you consider football as just a part of the entertaiment industry you’re getting fed with.
False, if you consider football to be something more than that.

Reply

3 J D Smith April 30, 2009 at 1:52 am

The only reason Chelsea played the way they did was to escape a hiding like
Bayern got. They did the right thing in smothering the Barca attack.
I didn’t enjoy the spectacle either but it was the only way to fight another day. With a huge crowd baying for their blood it took courage and plenty of concentration to survive. Do not group the way they played with their everyday style. If you watched the Liverpool v Chelsea matches in the quarter final you saw Chelsea and Liverpool play some great football between them. I often watch German football and it is nearest to English way of playing. I also watch Barca v Bayern and it was so onesided and Chelsea
knew if they played and attacked Barca at Barca then they were in for a beating. Now, however they have a chance to get a result at home.

Reply

4 joe smith April 30, 2009 at 2:43 am

first of all, asshole, funner is not a word. this article is pathetic. “anti-football”?? you’re a disgrace. you wish bayern had a shot in the 2nd leg at Allianz Arena, but you know why they didnt? because they got their asses handed to them by the best attacking team in the world in the first leg. chelsea could have done that, dont get me wrong they would have gotten a lot better of a result than 4-0, but they are too smart for that. this recent criticism is laughable and its pathetic that you want to remove all strategy from the game. What do you want to see? all out attacking up and down the field? the only strategy is to score more than your opponent. you are clueless

Reply

5 santosh April 30, 2009 at 3:17 am

No ways! The premiership is a far more competitive league than the rest of Europe. The league doesn’t just solely depend upon the television revenue, the quality of the game in England has gone up by leaps and bounds. Also, the foreign cntingent is increasing by the day and I think the English dominance is here to stay!

Reply

6 temi April 30, 2009 at 4:23 am

you obviously do not really know much about football. it is not just about passing and dribbling it is about strategy. chelsea was well aware of barcelona’s attack and her own makeshift defense line. the best line of attack from barcelona is messi and unfortunatly for chelsea the man to mark him doesn’t even use the left leg. if you watchd the match you will realise that bosingwa could not even make a kick with his left leg. chelsea knew this and adopted the defensive strategy. i did not enjoy d match but chelsea did a great job.
n nobody should give me d stuff about messi being just one man, that guy is damn good as three players. he scores the most and makes the most assists for his team. so marking him out was really important.

Reply

7 J.R. April 30, 2009 at 8:18 am

I agree with Allan, Joe Smith, pretty much everyone. Just another American turned somewhat football fan that has no idea and is trying to make a name for himself. You obviously don’t know strategy. Go back to coaching your step daughter’s U-9 team…easier for you to understand and “funner” for you.

Reply

8 Double Pivot April 30, 2009 at 11:39 am

Delightfully Hilarious. You guys sound like the 12 year old fan girl that overheard me call Twighlight “dull”. Keep it coming.

And funner is used colloquially. This is a blog, not the Guardian.

Reply

9 Football expert April 30, 2009 at 5:19 pm

Rubbish article. If you want to enjoy action try WWF. Champions League is a contest not drama.

Reply

10 Double Pivot April 30, 2009 at 5:58 pm

WWF? World Wildlife Foundation? That is just the most bizarre attempt at a put down. But I guess they do good work, so there’s something to be said for this Chelsea fan’s approach to my criticism.

Also, not an article…..it’s an opinion piece. I wouldn’t expect free speech to be highly valued by people who support an ex-Communista and Robber Baron.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: